Therefore, based on these advantages, it could be argued that the VBT would be more effective in improving physical performance than PBT.
Thirdly, instantaneous augmented feedback of velocity following each lifting repetition could motivate the athletes to enhance acute physical performance and improve adaptation accumulatively.
Secondly, monitoring the velocity loss in training set can assist to control the levels of efforts and fatigue in a certain range and make the lifted repetitions correspond well with the training specificity. Firstly, velocity can be attained to estimate the 1RM and regulate the intensity in real time to match the actual intention for the particular session regardless of the fluctuation of personal 1RM due to the fatigue, nutrition, sleep etc. Compared with PBT, VBT has several compelling features. Two new variables are adopted for prescribing the training load in VBT, one is the initial fastest repetition velocity in sets to set the load instead of %1RM, the other is the velocity loss threshold (VL) to terminate the set instead of the traditional fixed repetitions in sets. VBT is a resistance training intervention that uses velocity feedback to prescribe and/or manipulate training load. velocity based training (VBT), largely thanks to the major advancements in commercial velocity testing devices such as linear position transducers and accelerometers that allow for immediate feedback of repetition velocity. Over the past decade, there has been a surge of interest in using barbell velocity to measure and monitor the training intensity and volume, i.e. However, PBT has been criticized for the inherent limitations such as the complex process, risk of injury during the maximum strength test, and possible attenuation of type Ⅱ muscle fiber adaptation owing to the sets to failure, which may result in suboptimal training stimulus. Since its introduction by Thomas Delorme in 1940s, PBT has been studied and applied extensively, and proved to be an effective method by a huge body of researches. Traditionally, the resistance training prescription is based on percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM) and repetitions, namely traditional 1RM percentage-based resistance training (PBT). Among them, intensity and volume are the key variables in prescribing the program. It is well known that maximizing the resistance training effects largely depends on the manipulation of the program variables such as the intensity, volume, rest interval, duration, etc. Resistance training plays a pivotal role in enhancing strength, power, linear sprint and change of direction speed (CODs) performance in a wide range of healthy and athletic population. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.įunding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China funds to Yongming Li. Received: ApAccepted: OctoPublished: November 18, 2021Ĭopyright: © 2021 Liao et al.
PLoS ONE 16(11):Įditor: Daniel Boullosa, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, BRAZIL traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis. Citation: Liao K-F, Wang X-X, Han M-Y, Li L-L, Nassis GP, Li Y-M (2021) Effects of velocity based training vs.
0 kommentar(er)
